![vmix vs tricaster vmix vs tricaster](https://p.globalsources.com/IMAGES/PDT/BIG/999/B1179691999.jpg)
The need to connect multiple systems running multiple protocols together causes challenges when using multiple networks for different protocols. My point beïng: how can we trust NDI not to severely affect other protocols running on the same network without knowing what's going on. I'm using Cisco SG300 and SG350X switches with decent configs but I have also seen this behaviour with networks running Ubiquiti switches.
![vmix vs tricaster vmix vs tricaster](http://motiondiva.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Centre-1180x633.jpg)
What's going on within the NDI protocol that can affect a network in such a way that, without flow control, it severely affects performance like it does? Not only causing issues within its own applications (frame drops, aritfacts.) but also affecting other applications (not even beïng able to run a file transfer at decent speed anymore when an NDI stream is present, while the network isn't even at half capacity).
![vmix vs tricaster vmix vs tricaster](https://www.tikilive.com/manual/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/tricaster-40-interface.png)
#Vmix vs tricaster full#
The two major things are Flow Control and the distribution of NDI streams across connections when there are different paths from a source to a destination.Īccording to NDI Network guidelines this has to be enabled for NDI versions prior 3.5 to work, however I haven't managed to get a properly working 4.6 NDI network (fully tested so at least 400Mbps NDI traffic, mixed NDI and NDI/HX, mixed source/destination without major frame drops) without enabling it.įlow control is designed to minimize packet loss in case of network congestion, but why does it need to be enabled for NDI to work properly on a network that isn't congested at all? If I run a stress test on our network I get to nearly full speed both on both 1Gb and 10Gb networks, I would expect that runing 300-400Mbps of NDI should not cause any congestion. Also i'm wondering if it makes sense to move some of the protocols we now use in VLAN-based networks into one converged network (to avoid multihoming) I first want to fully onderstand the inner workings of the protocol and then decide on the right design. I have a working setup at the moment but in my mind there are a few things that just do not make sense from a networking point of view. We use a variety of NDI equipment such as production systems (Tricaster & vMix), NDI/NDI-HX enabled camera's, converters and other tools. My hope is that it will result in a more in-dept discussion about the best practices and not only "just enable this and if it works why bother", as that's unfortunately as far as I have come with NewTek support concerning some topics. Thanks in advance for any of your expertise.I'm in the process of designing new network configuration for our systems and since there's a variety of opinions on network settings and even NewTek network recommendations which contradict each other or do not work as they seem to be designed, I thought it is good to start a topic about the issues and networking questions I came across in the last few months. We could also consider cutting the camera/source inputs down to a couple if a piece of gear really makes sense otherwise. Do any of you have any suggestions? Would be awesome if the alternatives are a little cheaper than a new Tricaster Mini ($8000). We need the ability to live stream our broadcasts while also archiving at least at 1080p/60 at a great bitrate (another shortcoming of the old Tricaster Mini). We use three cameras, tons of B roll/motion graphics, and at least one Network input. We've finally reached the point where we want a new piece of gear. Our latest problem is random audio pops and audio distortion in the archives. Installing new firmware is always a circus and we often have to create new sessions to get it to work properly because they eventually get corrupted. Once we solve one, it works fine for a few months, and then it starts having some other issue. Greetings! We have a Tricaster Mini and have been using it for five years now.